A letter from TSU President Dr. John M. Rudley

Nelson

Well-Known Member
TigerFans Premium
Office of the President

Dr. John M. Rudley

Below is a letter sent to legislators by TSU President Dr. John M. Rudley to address issues facing Texas Southern University.
 
The number one problem facing Texas Southern University is the significant lack of state resources that amounts to a staggering 19% reduction in general revenue.
 
 In fiscal 2010, the university received $122 million in general revenue and now it is facing a proposed $99 million allocation.
 
Texas Southern has not been allocated any funds to continue the improvements that we have started while other public universities have received enhancement funds that further widens the gap for African American students who are predominately from Texas's urban metropolitan areas such as Houston and Dallas.
 
There are three areas of funding that the Legislative Budget Board cuts each session as a starting point for Texas Southern thereby jeopardizing its base budget.
 
The first item cut is the Academic Development Initiative (ADI) funding that was approved to make up for the 53 years since its designation as a state institution where the Texas State Legislature did not fairly allocate funding to TSU but instead funded traditionally white institutions' requests for both base and enhanced funding. The Academic Development Initiative funding avoided a federal law suit, which is currently administered by the US Department of Education and the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. The university provides annual progress reports to the Coordinating Board, which then submits our response to the Dallas Office of the US Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights regarding the impact of these funds on Texas Southern University. The original OCR request was $40 million and the settlement was for $25 million in fiscal 2000. These funds are a part of the university's base budget of $169 million and any reduction is a dollar for dollar reduction in operating funds.
 
The second area cut is the Hold Harmless funding that the state provides to institutions that suffer from unexpected and significant decreases in enrollment and other unusual situations such as the effects of hurricanes. In fiscal 2010, the legislature provided funding to stabilize the university's financial outlook since it had suffered from years of mismanagement and a host of deferred maintenance and unpaid debt. The legislature added to an existing hold harmless amount of $3.8 million by adding $6.6 million. The hold harmless funding allowed TSU to recover as intended but, in subsequent legislative sessions, the LBB removed the entire amount, including the original $3.8 million.
 
The third area of cuts is in our Institutional Enhancement funding, which is essentially a fund that is a consolidation of special item funding that institutions received in the past based upon specific initiatives. Texas Southern's institutional enhancement funds are for a Summer Academy for students who have developmental course requirements, accreditation for various colleges, the Mickey Leland Center and support for the administrative computing center. The institutional enhancement funds were cut from $18.6 million to $14.9 million.
 
A recap reflects:
 
(1) the cut in ADI ($25 million to $21.2 million)                                                   $ 3.8 million
(2) the cut in Hold Harmless ($3.8 + $6.6=$10.5)                                                $10.5 million
(3) the cut in Institutional Enhancement ($18.6 to $14.9)                                  $ 3.7 million
Total cuts for Texas Southern University for three items:                                  $18.0 million
 
The current recommendation by the LBB, further cuts TSU's budget by $1.5 million in formula funding and $635 thousand in formula research funding. Total reductions for TSU amounts to $20.1 million.    
 
To add insult to injury, the TSU School of Pharmacy was excluded from a $4 million equity funding allocation in the last legislative session that was argued for by both TSU and the University of Houston but only the University of Houston received funding. This funding disparity is a perfect example of a perceived legislative preference by unknown decision makers to fund other institutions and not Texas Southern when both pharmacy schools require the same resources.
 
We have made tremendous strides in raising the quality of the university during the past seven years, and we would appreciate your assistance in correcting the significant reductions in funding for Texas Southern University so we can continue this progress.
 
Click the attachment to view the chart below.
[attachment=167]
 
Sincerely,
 
John M. Rudley
President 
 
[img=784x476]https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/S-AxUKduPb-Sa0SiYfVbhKzUivLAjn5IxTpGxzZQYNrDffbqdmvT2e-YU8j8P0c726AiZwzg4JZXPrWOCVUq_Y6jlv2swMrKprqoviWRa76d6-OvqFTOL4K_-rHnMXLjH3aN=s0-d-e1-ft#http://files.ctctcdn.com/ea170298001/9e6bf4f1-b753-4819-9eda-8e68f9962056.jpg[/img]
 

Attachments

  • 2245b0ab-da58-4891-a0a7-2cc044914b1a.pdf
    333.9 KB · Views: 0
Nelson said:
Office of the President


Dr. John M. Rudley

Below is a letter sent to legislators by TSU President Dr. John M. Rudley to address issues facing Texas Southern University.
 
The number one problem facing Texas Southern University is the significant lack of state resources that amounts to a staggering 19% reduction in general revenue.
 
 In fiscal 2010, the university received $122 million in general revenue and now it is facing a proposed $99 million allocation.
 
Texas Southern has not been allocated any funds to continue the improvements that we have started while other public universities have received enhancement funds that further widens the gap for African American students who are predominately from Texas's urban metropolitan areas such as Houston and Dallas.
 
There are three areas of funding that the Legislative Budget Board cuts each session as a starting point for Texas Southern thereby jeopardizing its base budget.
 
The first item cut is the Academic Development Initiative (ADI) funding that was approved to make up for the 53 years since its designation as a state institution where the Texas State Legislature did not fairly allocate funding to TSU but instead funded traditionally white institutions' requests for both base and enhanced funding. The Academic Development Initiative funding avoided a federal law suit, which is currently administered by the US Department of Education and the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. The university provides annual progress reports to the Coordinating Board, which then submits our response to the Dallas Office of the US Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights regarding the impact of these funds on Texas Southern University. The original OCR request was $40 million and the settlement was for $25 million in fiscal 2000. These funds are a part of the university's base budget of $169 million and any reduction is a dollar for dollar reduction in operating funds.
 
The second area cut is the Hold Harmless funding that the state provides to institutions that suffer from unexpected and significant decreases in enrollment and other unusual situations such as the effects of hurricanes. In fiscal 2010, the legislature provided funding to stabilize the university's financial outlook since it had suffered from years of mismanagement and a host of deferred maintenance and unpaid debt. The legislature added to an existing hold harmless amount of $3.8 million by adding $6.6 million. The hold harmless funding allowed TSU to recover as intended but, in subsequent legislative sessions, the LBB removed the entire amount, including the original $3.8 million.
 
The third area of cuts is in our Institutional Enhancement funding, which is essentially a fund that is a consolidation of special item funding that institutions received in the past based upon specific initiatives. Texas Southern's institutional enhancement funds are for a Summer Academy for students who have developmental course requirements, accreditation for various colleges, the Mickey Leland Center and support for the administrative computing center. The institutional enhancement funds were cut from $18.6 million to $14.9 million.
 
A recap reflects:
 
(1) the cut in ADI ($25 million to $21.2 million)                                                   $ 3.8 million
(2) the cut in Hold Harmless ($3.8 + $6.6=$10.5)                                                $10.5 million
(3) the cut in Institutional Enhancement ($18.6 to $14.9)                                  $ 3.7 million
Total cuts for Texas Southern University for three items:                                  $18.0 million
 
The current recommendation by the LBB, further cuts TSU's budget by $1.5 million in formula funding and $635 thousand in formula research funding. Total reductions for TSU amounts to $20.1 million.    
 
To add insult to injury, the TSU School of Pharmacy was excluded from a $4 million equity funding allocation in the last legislative session that was argued for by both TSU and the University of Houston but only the University of Houston received funding. This funding disparity is a perfect example of a perceived legislative preference by unknown decision makers to fund other institutions and not Texas Southern when both pharmacy schools require the same resources.
 
We have made tremendous strides in raising the quality of the university during the past seven years, and we would appreciate your assistance in correcting the significant reductions in funding for Texas Southern University so we can continue this progress.
 
Click the attachment to view the chart below.

 
Sincerely,
 
John M. Rudley
President 
 
[img=784x476]https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/S-AxUKduPb-Sa0SiYfVbhKzUivLAjn5IxTpGxzZQYNrDffbqdmvT2e-YU8j8P0c726AiZwzg4JZXPrWOCVUq_Y6jlv2swMrKprqoviWRa76d6-OvqFTOL4K_-rHnMXLjH3aN=s0-d-e1-ft#http://files.ctctcdn.com/ea170298001/9e6bf4f1-b753-4819-9eda-8e68f9962056.jpg[/img]

See stuff like this makes me we want to go completely off.  This has been going on for years. But it seemed as if TSU has a better relationship with the new governor than the old so I thought it would change for our good.  He invited TSU to his inaugural parade, tweeting TSU ... more than the previous governor ever done but it could be purely political to get more minority likes.

However we need to do what we can to give these racist (that's what they are) less ammo to overlook us.  These people see TSU graduation rates and instantly think we're undeserving of valid consideration.

1) TSU needs to be more selective with admissions.  There's no way some should've been accepted into college even on conditional grounds.  And looking at their social media makes it very clear they're coming to college with no goals or ambitions other than to party, fight, sleep around, be popular, and get high.  These people are not the majority but they make up too big of a part of TSU and most can easily be screened out on their social media and high school grades.  Not everybody deserves a second chance just because and those who don't are liable to damage the brand even more and disrupt the learning process for those who deserve to be there. Attending college is a privilege.

2) The matriculation process at TSU needs total revamping.  I encountered a communications major who will be graduating next year who wrote a paper on the 8th grade level .... I was so hurt, how in the hell she got to be a 2nd semester COMMUNICATION (which heavily involves writing) junior not knowing how to write a sophisticated one page paper?!!!! That dampens our brand.  Then I have a TSU alumnae friend who works in HR at a nearby company downtown that told me the TSU students are usually the most ill prepared (all had mostly bad grades too). 

3) Mandate that our best and brightest are seen. Make our best students (usually found in the Honors College, HC alum here whoop whoop) apply for prestigious scholarships (Rhodes, Truman, Goldwater etc), internships, and research opportunities. Get our faculty to write more books and do more research that's nationally published and recognized. It has to be known that this university in 3rd ward is a forced to be reckon with on a national/international scale.

I must say this, I've met some sharp TSU grads and will continue too. However we need to ensure that there's a model in place at every school that validates each students leaves with the essentials.   I hope to work closely with the university to help with that one day.  I like the direction TSU is going but it's going to be a fight with each step. The more we can improve the reputation and visibility (sports help) of our school, the more money we're likely to get ... it'll be harder for them to ignore the incredible impact and purpose for TSU in Texas.
 
Back
Top